Author Topic: SPD6803 direct from Pi?  (Read 149 times)

Offline AAH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Location: Australia
  • Posts: 591
  • Kudos: 18
  • Blinky blinky blinky
    • I love blinky lights
SPD6803 direct from Pi?
« on: December 07, 2017, 09:45:34 PM »
I was wondering if Falcon Player has ever had a library created to drive 6803 pixels. Using the same outputs as the Pi uses for WS2801 would allow me to use my rPi-28D to control old LOR strips from the "2801" output as well as 2811 series pixels.
You can call me AAH, you can call me Al, or you can call me Alan.
http://www.hansonelectronics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Catalogue.pdf Catalogue
http://www.hansonelectronics.com.au/

Offline CaptainMurdoch

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Location: Washington
  • Posts: 9,014
  • Kudos: 178
Re: SPD6803 direct from Pi?
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2017, 11:55:55 PM »
Not currently, but I want to add support for Henner's "spixel" library which supports 16 strings of WS2801, APA102, or LPD6803 on the Pi.

https://github.com/hzeller/spixels

I haven't had a chance to look at it yet though.  I also need to upgrade the rpi_ws281x library to pull in bug fixes and support for the newer Pi ZeroW.
-
Chris

Offline AAH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Location: Australia
  • Posts: 591
  • Kudos: 18
  • Blinky blinky blinky
    • I love blinky lights
Re: SPD6803 direct from Pi?
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2017, 12:42:19 AM »
No problems Chris. As long as it's done by tomorrow it's all good ;)
In all seriousness I don't need it any time in the near future but if it got added in the New Year it would suit me fine.
A single string on the same output as what is currently used for the 2801 is what I hope can be managed so it maintains compatibility with my current board. If I knew how to do any coding I'd have a fiddle myself as I know the 2801 is almost simple enough to program with a couple of toggle switches. I imagine the other 4 wire lights are also reasonably similar as they take the critical timing requirements away.

 

Back to top