News:

LATEST RELEASE:  FPP 6.1 - Download from here - https://github.com/FalconChristmas/fpp/releases/tag/6.1

+-+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Site Stats

Members
Total Members: 15503
Latest: mariobros00
New This Month: 11
New This Week: 39
New Today: 4
Stats
Total Posts: 127150
Total Topics: 15597
Most Online Today: 72
Most Online Ever: 7634
(January 21, 2020, 02:14:03 AM)
Users Online
Members: 4
Guests: 50
Total: 54

E1.31 Universe Setup Question

Started by aERonAUtical96, December 01, 2018, 04:06:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

aERonAUtical96

As an simple example, let's say you have 2 elements, both with 50 nodes.  Is it more efficient to define 1 universe that covers both elements or split into 2 universes, 1 for each element?


Eg.



Element 1: 50 nodes, Ch 1-150
Element 2: 50 nodes, Ch 151-300


E1.31 Configuration 1
   Universe 1:  1-300


- or -


E1.31 Configuration 2
   Universe 1: 1-150
   Universe 2: 151-300


Simple example, but as you scale, better to define just enough universes @ 512 channels each to cover you channel counts or define a universe for each element that covers that element's channels?


I don't know why this just popped into my head laying in bed this morning.

pixelpuppy

Quote from: aERonAUtical96 on December 01, 2018, 04:06:47 AM
Is it more efficient to define 1 universe that covers both elements or split into 2 universes, 1 for each element?
... ...
Simple example, but as you scale, better to define just enough universes @ 512 channels each to cover you channel counts or define a universe for each element that covers that element's channels?

Generally speaking, its more efficient to make your Universes as full as possible.  Certainly from a networking perspective, fewer large universes is better than more small universes.   An E1.31 universe is just a "container" to send channels across the network.  The more channels you put in one container, and thus the fewer containers you have to send, the more efficient your network will be.

However, from a human standpoint, its sometimes easier to group them more logically (e.g. by area, models, or controller ports) and some people like to leave gaps for easy growth (not necessary, but can be convenient).  So the ultimate answer is up to you how you want to balance between maximum network efficiency and human ease-of-use
-Mark

Support FPP

+- Recent Topics

Setting up new Falcon f16v4 noob question by Scouser10231
Today at 03:45:54 PM

Sequence freeze by jnealand
Today at 02:51:04 PM

Raspberry PI 4 won't connect to WIFI by jnealand
Today at 02:46:23 PM

new piCaps in the works? by jnealand
Today at 02:38:26 PM

FPP not releasing control to WLED when idle by cwr89
Today at 01:04:54 PM

FPP 6.2 Video Issue by ppanelli3
Today at 12:04:54 PM

Beagle Bone Black for sale by ppanelli3
Today at 10:40:18 AM

Port 11 not working by rossg10
Today at 09:57:03 AM

Remote script issue by mac1321
Today at 06:43:26 AM

BRP Voting Plugin - Allow others to vote for your songs! by plaberge
December 02, 2022, 11:15:17 PM

Powered by EzPortal
Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod