LATEST RELEASE:  FPP 6.3 - Download from here -



Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Forgot your password?

+-Site Stats

Total Members: 15659
Latest: PaulDzRGB
New This Month: 9
New This Week: 3
New Today: 0
Total Posts: 128432
Total Topics: 15791
Most Online Today: 48
Most Online Ever: 7634
(January 21, 2020, 02:14:03 AM)
Users Online
Members: 3
Guests: 27
Total: 30

Getting Started - Planning for 2019

Started by FrizzleFrak, December 19, 2018, 09:17:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Hello all, I am new to the forum and the hobby. I have been looking at it for years and now I finally have the time to get into it!

I am looking at controller selection for my proposed display. I am looking at the F16V3 with differential expansion or just going the F48 route. I can do either a centrally located or distributed topology. If I do central I may push the distance limits by maybe 5 ' on certain elements. I I like the idea of the V3 with differential expansion, since I can do a mix. (Let me know if I'm wrong)  ;D .

The other thing that I have a hard time visualizing is the ports and how that relates to laying out the display topology. I know 1024 pixels/port and that ports get mapped to the elements in XLights. Example being my 3 mini trees total 510 pixels, so I could put them on one port and have pixels left over for another element in that area of the display? I.e yard outlines. (Understanding that power injection or a separate power supply will be required.)  Is the port referencing just the data output?

Attached is an image of my layout from XLights and a PDF sheet of the elements with pixel counts and lengths. Trying to start off in a semi organized fashion....

Thanks in advance!
" You'd find lady luck was really a hooker and you were fresh out of cash..."


I would recommend (as a first controller purchase) the F16v3 since you can add two Differential boards if needed.  That would give you 16 direct pixel outputs (3-wire type or 4-wire type, 8-bit or 12-bit pixel support) plus then 8 Differential outputs to 8 Differential Receivers (32 pixel outputs, support limited to 3-wire, 8-bit pixel types)

I mention the pixel "bit" levels because almost everyone here seems to use the 3-wire/8-bit pixel chips - BUT some will use the others. There are advantages to them, but for me, the cost increase isn't worth it. It may matter to Disney but not to me.
Long time Falcon, FPP and xLights user

Support FPP

+- Recent Topics

Warning/Error: Network incomplete frames hit 250. by JonD
Today at 10:59:15 AM

F16V3 with 2 expansion boards at 40 fps MAX PIXELS per output? by tbone321
February 06, 2023, 10:51:55 AM

F48V4-NS at 40 fps using all 48 pixel output ports? by Poporacer
February 06, 2023, 10:27:09 AM

Unable to update RPi 5.5 to latest version by JonB256
February 05, 2023, 07:23:16 PM

help getting started, next step? by rayster
February 05, 2023, 04:24:09 PM

F48v4NS - Pi or No Pi? by joeyblasko
February 05, 2023, 09:15:33 AM

Huidu Controllers LED matrix by CaptainMurdoch
February 04, 2023, 10:18:47 AM

FPP6.2 universes by darylc
February 03, 2023, 08:48:57 PM

F16v4 Ports vs Universe Configuration Question by k6ccc
February 03, 2023, 09:32:48 AM

Need Expert Advise on F16v4 Ports vs Universe Configuration by Kairus
February 03, 2023, 09:32:33 AM

Powered by EzPortal
Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod